Young Kim (California)
Young Kim (Republican Party) is a member of the U.S. House, representing California's 40th Congressional District. She assumed office on January 3, 2023. Her current term ends on January 3, 2027.
Kim (Republican Party) is running for re-election to the U.S. House to represent California's 40th Congressional District. She is on the ballot in the primary on June 2, 2026.[source]
Biography
Young Kim was born in Incheon, South Korea, and lives in La Habra, California. Kim earned a bachelor's degree in business administration from the University of Southern California in 1985. Her career experience includes owning a business and working as the director of community relations and Asian affairs for former U.S. Representative Ed Royce and as a financial analyst.[1][2]
Committee assignments
U.S. House
2025-2026
Kim was assigned to the following committees:[Source]
- Committee on Financial Services
- Committee on Financial Services
- Committee on Financial Services
- Committee on Foreign Affairs
- Committee on Foreign Affairs, Chair
- Committee on Foreign Affairs
2021-2022
Kim was assigned to the following committees:[Source]
- Committee on Foreign Affairs
- Africa, Global Health, and Global Human Rights
- Asia, the Pacific, Central Asia, and Nonproliferation
- Committee on Science, Space, and Technology
- Space and Aeronautics
- Committee on Small Business
- Economic Growth, Tax, and Capital Access
- Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Workforce Development, Ranking Member
2026 battleground election
Ballotpedia identified the June 2 top-two primary as a battleground election. The summary below is from our coverage of this election, found here.
Ten candidates are running in the top-two primary for California's 40th Congressional District on June 2, 2026. Incumbent Ken Calvert (R), incumbent Young Kim (R), Joe Kerr (D), and Esther Kim Varet (D) lead in campaign fundraising and polling ahead of the election.
Currently, Calvert represents California's 41st Congressional District, and Kim represents the 40th District. The two incumbents were drawn into the same district as a result of Proposition 50, a redistricting amendment voters approved in November 2025. According to ABC7's Josh Haskell, Calvert represents 51% of the new district and Kim represents 35% of the new district.[3] Based on 2024 presidential results, the new district is 10 percentage points more Republican than the old district.
Calvert was first elected to Congress in 1992. He earned his associate degree from Chaffey College and his bachelor's degree from San Diego State University. Before his election to Congress, Calvert was a small business owner in the restaurant and real estate industries.[4]
Calvert is running on his record. His campaign website says, "Ken’s legislative work has received top ratings from the Americans for Tax Reform, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, National Federation of Independent Businesses, National Association of Manufacturers, and the 60 Plus Association" and highlighted his legislation creating the E-Verify system to verify the legal status of employees, securing federal funding for transportation and environmental projects, and constituent services.[5][6]
Kim was first elected to Congress in 2022. She earned her bachelor's degree in business administration from the University of Southern California. She worked as a business owner, financial analyst, and staff for then-U.S. Rep. Ed Royce (R).[7] She represented District 65 of the California State Assembly from 2014-2016.
Kim is running on her record. Her campaign website says, "In Congress, I fight everyday to ensure President Trump has allies to undo the disastrous Joe Biden-Nancy Pelosi agenda that caused skyrocketing prices, rising crime, open the border, and a political class that does the bidding of the swamp instead of fighting for working families."[8]
Kerr was a fire captain and Orange County Professional Firefighters Association president.[9] On his campaign website, Kerr describes himself as "a firefighter, labor leader, and problem-solver who has spent my career protecting communities and fighting for working families."[10]
Kerr says he is running for Congress "to take on the challenges that determine whether families can afford to live and thrive in our communities: lowering everyday costs, creating good-paying jobs, strengthening public safety, protecting healthcare and reproductive freedom, and ensuring government works for the people it serves."[10]
Varet earned her bachelor's degree from Yale University and her master's degree and doctorate from Columbia University, each in art history.[11] She owns the contemporary art gallery Various Small Fires.[12]
Varet says she is running "because we can’t keep electing the same cynical career politicians and expecting different results. I’m a working mom, an entrepreneur, and a problem solver. I don’t just talk — I roll up my sleeves and get things done. And I’m not afraid to fight hard for the issues that matter."[13]
California uses a top-two primary system, in which all candidates appear on the same ballot. The top two vote-getters, regardless of party affiliation, move on to the general election.
Elections
2026
See also: California's 40th Congressional District election, 2026
California's 40th Congressional District election, 2026 (June 2 top-two primary)
General election
The primary will occur on June 2, 2026. The general election will occur on November 3, 2026. General election candidates will be added here following the primary.
Nonpartisan primary election
Nonpartisan primary for U.S. House California District 40
The following candidates are running in the primary for U.S. House California District 40 on June 2, 2026.
Candidate | ||
| Ken Calvert (R) | ||
| Young Kim (R) | ||
| Francis Hoffman (D) | ||
| Claude Keissieh (D) | ||
| Joe Kerr (D) | ||
| Nina Linh (No party preference) | ||
| Lisa Ramirez (D) | ||
| Esther Kim Varet (D) | ||
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
- Christian Ahmed (No party preference)
- Eric Peterson (D)
- Paula Swift (D)
- Tiffanie Tate (D)
- Christina Gagnier (D)
- Perry Meade (D)
- Maricar Payad (American Independent Party)
Polls
- See also: Ballotpedia's approach to covering polls
Polls are conducted with a variety of methodologies and have margins of error or credibility intervals.[14] The Pew Research Center wrote, "A margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points at the 95% confidence level means that if we fielded the same survey 100 times, we would expect the result to be within 3 percentage points of the true population value 95 of those times."[15] For tips on reading polls from FiveThirtyEight, click here. For tips from Pew, click here.
Below we provide results for polls from a wide variety of sources, including media outlets, social media, campaigns, and aggregation websites, when available. We only report polls for which we can find a margin of error or credibility interval. Know of something we're missing? Click here to let us know.
| Poll | Dates | Calvert (R) | Kerr (D) | Kim (R) | Varet (D) | Undecided | Sample size | Margin of error | Sponsor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
– | 22 | 22 | 23 | 14 | 19 | 400 LV | ± 4.9% | Young Kim (R) | |
| Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters. | |||||||||
Candidate spending
| Name | Party | Receipts* | Disbursements** | Cash on hand | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ken Calvert | Republican Party | $4,493,644 | $1,338,897 | $3,416,882 | As of December 31, 2025 |
| Young Kim | Republican Party | $6,339,771 | $2,580,505 | $5,496,764 | As of December 31, 2025 |
| Francis Hoffman | Democratic Party | $0 | $0 | $0 | Data not available*** |
| Claude Keissieh | Democratic Party | $22,100 | $22,090 | $15 | As of December 31, 2025 |
| Joe Kerr | Democratic Party | $193,569 | $183,780 | $9,789 | As of December 31, 2025 |
| Lisa Ramirez | Democratic Party | $268,764 | $186,871 | $81,893 | As of December 31, 2025 |
| Esther Kim Varet | Democratic Party | $2,390,181 | $1,228,564 | $1,161,617 | As of December 31, 2025 |
| Nina Linh | No party preference | $226,322 | $111,416 | $114,906 | As of December 31, 2025 |
|
Source: Federal Elections Commission, "Campaign finance data," 2026. This product uses the openFEC API but is not endorsed or certified by the Federal Election Commission (FEC).
* According to the FEC, "Receipts are anything of value (money, goods, services or property) received by a political committee." |
|||||
Satellite spending
- See also: Satellite spending
Satellite spending describes political spending not controlled by candidates or their campaigns; that is, any political expenditures made by groups or individuals that are not directly affiliated with a candidate. This includes spending by political party committees, super PACs, trade associations, and 501(c)(4) nonprofit groups.[16][17][18]
If available, this section includes links to online resources tracking satellite spending in this election. To notify us of a resource to add, email us.
| By candidate | By election |
|---|---|
Endorsements
Ballotpedia is gathering information about candidate endorsements. To send us an endorsement, click here.
2024
See also: California's 40th Congressional District election, 2024
California's 40th Congressional District election, 2024 (March 5 top-two primary)
General election
General election for U.S. House California District 40
Incumbent Young Kim defeated Joe Kerr in the general election for U.S. House California District 40 on November 5, 2024.
| Total votes: 383,635 | ||||
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Nonpartisan primary election
Nonpartisan primary for U.S. House California District 40
Incumbent Young Kim and Joe Kerr defeated Allyson Damikolas in the primary for U.S. House California District 40 on March 5, 2024.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
| ✔ | Young Kim (R) | 56.4 | 109,963 | |
| ✔ | Joe Kerr (D) | 25.6 | 49,965 | |
Allyson Damikolas (D) ![]() | 18.0 | 35,153 | ||
| Total votes: 195,081 | ||||
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
2022
See also: California's 40th Congressional District election, 2022
General election
General election for U.S. House California District 40
Incumbent Young Kim defeated Asif Mahmood in the general election for U.S. House California District 40 on November 8, 2022.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
| ✔ | Young Kim (R) | 56.8 | 161,589 | |
| Asif Mahmood (D) | 43.2 | 122,722 | ||
| Total votes: 284,311 | ||||
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Nonpartisan primary election
Nonpartisan primary for U.S. House California District 40
Asif Mahmood and incumbent Young Kim defeated Greg Raths and Nicholas Taurus in the primary for U.S. House California District 40 on June 7, 2022.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
| ✔ | Asif Mahmood (D) | 40.9 | 74,607 | |
| ✔ | Young Kim (R) | 34.7 | 63,346 | |
Greg Raths (R) ![]() | 23.2 | 42,404 | ||
| Nicholas Taurus (R) | 1.2 | 2,193 | ||
| Total votes: 182,550 | ||||
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
- Hilaire Shioura (R)
2020
See also: California's 39th Congressional District election, 2020
General election
General election for U.S. House California District 39
Young Kim defeated incumbent Gil Cisneros in the general election for U.S. House California District 39 on November 3, 2020.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
| ✔ | Young Kim (R) | 50.6 | 173,946 | |
| Gil Cisneros (D) | 49.4 | 169,837 | ||
| Total votes: 343,783 | ||||
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Nonpartisan primary election
Nonpartisan primary for U.S. House California District 39
Young Kim and incumbent Gil Cisneros defeated Steve Cox in the primary for U.S. House California District 39 on March 3, 2020.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
| ✔ | Young Kim (R) | 48.3 | 83,941 | |
| ✔ | Gil Cisneros (D) | 46.9 | 81,402 | |
| Steve Cox (Independent) | 4.8 | 8,286 | ||
| Total votes: 173,629 | ||||
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
- Jay Chen (D)
2018
General election
General election for U.S. House California District 39
Gil Cisneros defeated Young Kim in the general election for U.S. House California District 39 on November 6, 2018.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
| ✔ | Gil Cisneros (D) | 51.6 | 126,002 | |
| Young Kim (R) | 48.4 | 118,391 | ||
| Total votes: 244,393 | ||||
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Nonpartisan primary election
Nonpartisan primary for U.S. House California District 39
The following candidates ran in the primary for U.S. House California District 39 on June 5, 2018.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
| ✔ | Young Kim (R) | 21.2 | 30,019 | |
| ✔ | Gil Cisneros (D) | 19.4 | 27,469 | |
| Phil Liberatore (R) | 14.3 | 20,257 | ||
| Andy Thorburn (D) | 9.2 | 12,990 | ||
| Shawn Nelson (R) | 6.9 | 9,750 | ||
| Bob Huff (R) | 6.2 | 8,699 | ||
| Sam Jammal (D) | 5.4 | 7,613 | ||
Mai Khanh Tran (D) ![]() | 5.3 | 7,430 | ||
| Herbert Lee (D) | 4.2 | 5,988 | ||
| Steve Vargas (R) | 2.9 | 4,144 | ||
| Suzi Park Leggett (D) | 1.5 | 2,058 | ||
| John Cullum (R) | 1.2 | 1,747 | ||
| Karen Lee Schatzle (Independent) | 0.6 | 903 | ||
| Steve Cox (Independent) | 0.6 | 856 | ||
| Andrew Sarega (R) | 0.6 | 823 | ||
| Sophia Alexander (Independent) | 0.4 | 523 | ||
| Ted Alemayhu (Independent American Party) | 0.1 | 176 | ||
| Total votes: 141,445 | ||||
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
| If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. | ||||
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
- Julio Castañeda (Independent)
- Phil Janowicz (D)
- Ted Rusk (D)
- Cybil Steed (D)
- Jay Chen (D)
2016
Elections for the California State Assembly took place in 2016. The primary election was held on June 7, 2016, and the general election was held on November 8, 2016. The candidate filing deadline was February 25, 2016, for candidates filing with signatures. The deadline for candidates using a filing fee to qualify was March 11, 2016.[19]
Sharon Quirk-Silva defeated incumbent Young Kim in the California State Assembly District 65 general election.[20][21]
| California State Assembly, District 65 General Election, 2016 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
| Democratic | 53.25% | 79,654 | ||
| Republican | Young Kim Incumbent | 46.75% | 69,941 | |
| Total Votes | 149,595 | |||
| Source: California Secretary of State | ||||
Sharon Quirk-Silva and incumbent Young Kim were unopposed in the California State Assembly District 65 Blanket primary.[22][23]
| California State Assembly, District 65 Blanket Primary, 2016 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Party | Candidate | |
| Democratic | ||
| Republican | ||
2014
Elections for the California State Assembly took place in 2014. A primary election took place on June 3, 2014. The general election was held on November 4, 2014. The signature filing deadline for candidates wishing to run in this election was March 7, 2014. Incumbent Sharon Quirk-Silva (D) and Young Kim (R) were unopposed in the blanket primary. Quirk-Silva was defeated by Kim in the general election.[24][25][26]
| Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 54.6% | 42,376 | ||
| Democratic | Sharon Quirk-Silva Incumbent | 45.4% | 35,204 | |
| Total Votes | 77,580 | |||
Campaign themes
2026
Ballotpedia survey responses
See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection
Young Kim has not yet completed Ballotpedia's 2026 Candidate Connection survey. Send a message to Young Kim asking her to fill out the survey. If you are Young Kim, click here to fill out Ballotpedia's 2026 Candidate Connection survey.
Who fills out Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey?
Any candidate running for elected office, at any level, can complete Ballotpedia's Candidate Survey. Completing the survey will update the candidate's Ballotpedia profile, letting voters know who they are and what they stand for. More than 26,000 candidates have taken Ballotpedia's candidate survey since we launched it in 2015. Learn more about the survey here.
You can ask Young Kim to fill out this survey by using the buttons below or emailing info@youngkimforcongress.com.
2024
Young Kim did not complete Ballotpedia's 2024 Candidate Connection survey.
2022
Young Kim did not complete Ballotpedia's 2022 Candidate Connection survey.
2020
Young Kim did not complete Ballotpedia's 2020 Candidate Connection survey.
2018
Campaign website
Kim's campaign website stated the following:
| “ |
Fighting to Create Jobs and Strengthen the Economy As a small business owner, Young knows what it takes to create an environment where jobs can be created and workers can thrive. Young believes that the hard working men and women of Southern California are taxed and regulated enough. She will fight to keep taxes low so that individuals and families can keep more of their hard earned dollars because they know how best to spend their money, not Washington politicians. Young will fight to help create and keep good paying jobs right here in Southern California. She will work to reduce unnecessary regulations, increase trade, and work with state and local leaders to create an environment where business can prosper and create good paying jobs. Keeping America Safe Young knows that keeping Americans safe and secure is vital in order to enjoy the freedoms and the prosperity we cherish. At home, Young knows we must make sure that our first responders have the equipment that they need to deal with new and evolving threats to our security. Abroad, Young believes that America should be a leader in the world by standing up for the values that have made our country great and given so many hope. We should work to build consensus in the international community to improve our world while showing resolve in the face of rogue nations and terrorism. Honoring Our Veterans Young believes that we owe a great debt to those who have served in our nation’s armed services. She will fight to make sure that veterans receive the quality care that they were promised by working to reform the VA and increase accessibility in Southern California. Immigration As a proud immigrant, Young wants people from around the world to be able to legally immigrate to our country, become citizens, and achieve the American dream. However, our immigration system is broken and must be fixed. Young will work with anyone who is willing to reform our immigration system, increase border security, and make sure that those brought to this country as children without legal documentation are treated fairly and with compassion. Empowering Teachers and Investing In Our Schools Top-down, one-size-fits-all policies from Washington don’t work in our local schools. Young believes that our parents and teachers know best how local students learn and succeed. She will fight for increased STEM education funding and to make sure education dollars go to teachers and classrooms not bureaucrats in Sacramento or Washington, D.C.[27] |
” |
| —Young Kim for Congress[28] | ||
Campaign advertisements
The following is an example of an ad from Kim's 2018 election campaign.
|
2014
Kim's website highlighted the following campaign themes:[29]
| “ | I believe we need to change the Legislature in order to save California. I am committed to:
|
” |
Campaign finance summary
Note: The finance data shown here comes from the disclosures required of candidates and parties. Depending on the election or state, this may represent only a portion of all the funds spent on their behalf. Satellite spending groups may or may not have expended funds related to the candidate or politician on whose page you are reading this disclaimer. Campaign finance data from elections may be incomplete. For elections to federal offices, complete data can be found at the FEC website. Click here for more on federal campaign finance law and here for more on state campaign finance law.
Notable endorsements
This section displays endorsements this individual made in elections within Ballotpedia's coverage scope.
Personal finance disclosures
Members of the House are required to file financial disclosure reports. You can search disclosure reports on the House’s official website here.
Analysis
Below are links to scores and rankings Ballotpedia compiled for members of Congress. We chose analyses that help readers understand how each individual legislator fit into the context of the chamber as a whole in terms of ideology, bill advancement, bipartisanship, and more.
If you would like to suggest an analysis for inclusion in this section, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.
119th Congress (2025-2027)
118th Congress (2023-2025)
117th Congress (2021-2023)
Key votes
- See also: Key votes
Ballotpedia monitors legislation that receives a vote and highlights the ones that we consider to be key to understanding where elected officials stand on the issues. To read more about how we identify key votes, click here.
Key votes: 118th Congress, 2023-2025
The 118th United States Congress began on January 3, 2023, and ended on January 3, 2025. At the start of the session, Republicans held the majority in the U.S. House of Representatives (222-212), and Democrats held the majority in the U.S. Senate (51-49). Joe Biden (D) was the president and Kamala Harris (D) was the vice president. We identified the key votes below using Congress' top-viewed bills list and through marquee coverage of certain votes on Ballotpedia.
| Key votes: 118th Congress, 2023-2025 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vote | Bill and description | Status | ||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
| Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) |
|
Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) (216-212) | ||||||
|
||||||||
| Rep. Mike Johnson (R-La.) |
|
Rep. Mike Johnson (R-La.) (220-209) | ||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
Key votes: Previous sessions of Congress
Key votes: 117th Congress, 2021-2023
The 117th United States Congress began on January 3, 2021 and ended on January 3, 2023. At the start of the session, Democrats held the majority in the U.S. House of Representatives (222-213), and the U.S. Senate had a 50-50 makeup. Democrats assumed control of the Senate on January 20, 2021, when President Joe Biden (D) and Vice President Kamala Harris (D), who acted as a tie-breaking vote in the chamber, assumed office. We identified the key votes below using Congress' top-viewed bills list and through marquee coverage of certain votes on Ballotpedia.
| Key votes: 117th Congress, 2021-2023 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vote | Bill and description | Status | ||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
State legislative tenure
Scorecards
A scorecard evaluates a legislator’s voting record. Its purpose is to inform voters about the legislator’s political positions. Because scorecards have varying purposes and methodologies, each report should be considered on its own merits. For example, an advocacy group’s scorecard may assess a legislator’s voting record on one issue while a state newspaper’s scorecard may evaluate the voting record in its entirety.
Ballotpedia is in the process of developing an encyclopedic list of published scorecards. Some states have a limited number of available scorecards or scorecards produced only by select groups. It is Ballotpedia’s goal to incorporate all available scorecards regardless of ideology or number.
Click here for an overview of legislative scorecards in all 50 states. To contribute to the list of scorecards, email suggestions to editor@ballotpedia.org.
Below you can find the scorecards found for the California State Legislature in 2025.
- California Chamber of Commerce — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills supported or opposed by the chamber.
- California Environmental Voters — Legislators are scored on their votes on environmental issues.
- California Labor Federation — Legislators are scored on their votes on issues related to labor.
- Children's Advocacy Institute — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to family issues.
- Equality California — Legislators are scored on their votes on LGBT issues.
- Health Access California — Legislators are scored on their votes on issues related to the interests of health care consumers.
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association — Legislators are scored on how they voted on taxpayer-related issues.
- Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California — Legislators are scored on issues related to sexual and reproductive health.
- Sierra Club California — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to environmental policy.
- The Freedom Index — Legislators are scored on their adherence to the limited government principles of the U.S. Constitution.
Below you can find the scorecards found for the California State Legislature in 2024.
- California Chamber of Commerce — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills supported or opposed by the chamber.
- California Environmental Justice Alliance — Legislators are scored on their votes on environmental issues.
- California Environmental Voters — Legislators are scored on their votes on environmental issues.
- California Labor Federation — Legislators are scored on their votes on issues related to labor.
- Children's Advocacy Institute — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to family issues.
- Equality California — Legislators are scored on their votes on LGBT issues.
- Health Access California — Legislators are scored on their votes on issues related to the interests of health care consumers.
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association — Legislators are scored on how they voted on taxpayer-related issues.
- National Federation of Independent Business — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to business issues.
- Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California — Legislators are scored on issues related to sexual and reproductive health.
- Reproductive Freedom For All — Legislators are scored on issues related to sexual and reproductive health.
- Sierra Club California — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to environmental policy.
Below you can find the scorecards found for the California State Legislature in 2023.
- ACLU California Action — Legislators are scored on their votes on the association's position legislation.
- California Chamber of Commerce — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills supported or opposed by the chamber.
- California Environmental Justice Alliance — Legislators are scored on their votes on environmental issues.
- California Environmental Voters — Legislators are scored on their votes on environmental issues.
- California Labor Federation — Legislators are scored on their votes on issues related to labor.
- Children's Advocacy Institute — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to family issues.
- Equality California — Legislators are scored on their votes on LGBT issues.
- Health Access California — Legislators are scored on their votes on issues related to the interests of health care consumers.
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association — Legislators are scored on how they voted on taxpayer-related issues.
- Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California — Legislators are scored on issues related to sexual and reproductive health.
- Sierra Club California — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to environmental policy.
Below you can find the scorecards found for the California State Legislature in 2022.
- California Chamber of Commerce — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills supported or opposed by the chamber.
- California Environmental Justice Alliance — Legislators are scored on their votes on environmental issues.
- California Environmental Voters — Legislators are scored on their votes on environmental issues.
- California Labor Federation — Legislators are scored on their votes on issues related to labor.
- California YIMBY — Legislators are scored on their votes on issues related to housing.
- Equality California — Legislators are scored on their votes on LGBT issues.
- Health Access California — Legislators are scored on their votes on issues related to the interests of health care consumers.
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association — Legislators are scored on how they voted on taxpayer-related issues.
- NARAL Pro-Choice California — Legislators are scored on issues related to sexual and reproductive health.
- National Association of Social Workers California Chapter — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills supported or opposed by the organization.
- National Federation of Independent Business — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to business issues.
- Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California — Legislators are scored on issues related to sexual and reproductive health.
- Planning and Conservation League — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills supported or opposed by the organization.
- Sierra Club California — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to environmental policy.
- The Institute for Legislative Analysis — Legislators are scored on their adherence to the limited government principles of the U.S. Constitution.
- United Domestic Workers of America — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to the interests of home care providers.
Below you can find the scorecards found for the California State Legislature in 2021.
- California Chamber of Commerce — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills supported or opposed by the chamber.
- California Environmental Justice Alliance — Legislators are scored on their votes on environmental issues.
- California Environmental Voters — Legislators are scored on their votes on environmental issues.
- California Labor Federation — Legislators are scored on their votes on issues related to labor.
- California Teachers Association — Legislators are scored on their votes on the association's position legislation.
- California YIMBY — Legislators are scored on their votes on issues related to housing.
- Children's Advocacy Institute — Legislators are scored on their votes on issues pertaining to children.
- Equality California — Legislators are scored on their votes on LGBT issues.
- Health Access California — Legislators are scored on their votes on issues related to the interests of health care consumers.
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association — Legislators are scored on how they voted on taxpayer-related issues.
- Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California — Legislators are scored on issues related to sexual and reproductive health.
- Sierra Club California — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to environmental policy.
- The American Conservative Union — Legislators are scored on their votes on conservative issues.
- The People's Report Card of California — Legislators are scored on their votes on the organization's priority legislation.
Below you can find the scorecards found for the California State Legislature in 2015.
- California Chamber of Commerce — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills supported or opposed by the chamber.
- California Civil Liberties Advocacy — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to civil liberties.
- California Environmental Justice Alliance — Legislators are scored on their votes on environmental issues.
- California Labor Federation — Legislators are scored on their votes on issues related to labor.
- California League of Conservation Voters — Legislators are scored on their votes on environmental issues.
- California ProLife Council — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills supported or opposed by CPC.
- Congress of California Seniors — Legislators are scored on their votes on senior issues.
- Consumer Federation of California — Legislators are scored on their votes on consumer issues.
- Equality California — Legislators are scored on their votes on LGBT issues.
- Health Access California — Legislators are scored by Health Access California on how they voted in the session on "critical health policy legislation that impacts consumers, communities, patients and the public interest."
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association — Legislators are scored on their votes on taxpayer-related issues.
- Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California — Legislators are scored on bills related to reproductive health issues.
- Secular Coalition for California — Legislators are scored on their stances on secular policy.
- Sierra Club California — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to environmental policy.
- The American Conservative Union — Legislators are scored on their votes on conservative issues.
Below you can find the scorecards found for the California State Legislature in 2014.
- California Chamber of Commerce — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills supported or opposed by the chamber.
- California Civil Liberties Council — Legislators are scored by the California Civil Liberties Council on their votes on "bills related to due process, privacy rights, equal protection, and criminal justice."
- California Clean Money Action Fund — Legislators are scored by California Clean Money Action on their votes on bills "to limit the undue influence of Big Money in politics in California."
- California Environmental Justice Alliance — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to environmental issues.
- California Labor Federation — Legislators are scored on their votes on issues related to labor.
- California League of Conservation Voters — Legislators are scored on their votes on environmental issues.
- Congress of California Seniors — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills that relate to senior issues.
- Consumer Federation of California — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to consumers.
- Equality California — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills supported by the organization.
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association — Legislators are scored on their votes on taxpayer-related issues.
- National Federation of Independent Business — Legislators are scored on their votes on small business issues.
- Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills supported or opposed by the organization.
- Secular Coalition for California — Legislators are scored on their stances on secular policy.
- Sierra Club California — Legislators are scored on their votes on bills related to environmental policy.
- The American Conservative Union — Legislators are scored on their votes on conservative issues.
Sponsored legislation
The following table lists bills this person sponsored as a legislator, according to BillTrack50 and sorted by action history. Bills are sorted by the date of their last action. The following list may not be comprehensive. To see all bills this legislator sponsored, click on the legislator's name in the title of the table.
Committee assignments
2015 legislative session
At the beginning of the 2015 legislative session, Kim served on the following committees:
| California committee assignments, 2015 |
|---|
| • Banking and Finance |
| • Budget |
| • Education |
| • Jobs, Economic Development, and the Economy, Vice chair |
| • Transportation |
See also
2026 Elections
External links
|
Candidate U.S. House California District 40 |
Officeholder U.S. House California District 40 |
Personal |
Footnotes
- ↑ Biographical Directory of the United States Congress, "Kim, Young," accessed December 2, 2022
- ↑ Representative Young Kim, "About," accessed December 2, 2022
- ↑ ABC7, "Dueling campaigns launched in new California District 40 after Prop 50 passes," November 5, 2025
- ↑ Congressman Ken Calvert, "Biography," accessed March 13, 2026
- ↑ Ken Calvert 2026 campaign website, "Meet Ken," accessed March 13, 2026
- ↑ Ken Calvert 2026 campaign website, "Ken Calvert's Record of Effective Representation in Congress," accessed March 13, 2026
- ↑ Biographical Directory of the United States Congress, "Kim, YOUNG," accessed March 13, 2026
- ↑ Young Kim 2026 campaign website, "Meet Young Kim," accessed March 13, 2026
- ↑ Joe Kerr 2026 campaign website, "Meet Joe," accessed March 13, 2026
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 Joe Kerr 2026 campaign website, "The Issues," accessed March 13, 2026
- ↑ Linkedin, "Esther Kim-Varet," accessed March 13, 2026
- ↑ Frieze, "Los Angeles According to: Esther Kim Varet from Various Small Fires," January 26, 2024
- ↑ Esther Kim Varet 2026 campaign website, "My Promise to You," accessed March 13, 2026
- ↑ For more information on the difference between margins of error and credibility intervals, see explanations from the American Association for Public Opinion Research and Ipsos.
- ↑ Pew Research Center, "5 key things to know about the margin of error in election polls," September 8, 2016
- ↑ OpenSecrets.org, "Outside Spending," accessed December 12, 2021
- ↑ OpenSecrets.org, "Total Outside Spending by Election Cycle, All Groups," accessed December 12, 2021
- ↑ National Review.com, "Why the Media Hate Super PACs," December 12, 2021
- ↑ California Secretary of State, "Key Dates and Deadlines," accessed April 18, 2017
- ↑ California Secretary of State, "Certified List of Candidates for the November 8, 2016, General Election," accessed September 7, 2016
- ↑ California Secretary of State, "2016 General Election results," accessed December 23, 2016
- ↑ California Secretary of State, "Certified List of Candidates for Voter-Nominated Offices," accessed April 4, 2016
- ↑ California Secretary of State, "Statement of Vote," accessed August 22, 2016
- ↑ California Secretary of State, "Official 2014 Primary election candidate list," accessed March 27, 2014
- ↑ California Secretary of State, "Official primary election results," accessed July 15, 2014
- ↑ California Secretary of State, "Official general election results," accessed December 14, 2014
- ↑ 27.0 27.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ Young Kim for Congress, "Issues," accessed September 15, 2018
- ↑ youngkim2014.com, "Official campaign website," accessed September 23, 2014
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.R.2670 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024," accessed February 23, 2024
- ↑ Clerk of the United States House of Representatives, "Roll Call 723," December 14, 2023
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.R.185 - To terminate the requirement imposed by the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for proof of COVID-19 vaccination for foreign travelers, and for other purposes." accessed February 23, 2024
- ↑ Clerk of the United States House of Representatives, "Roll Call 116," accessed May 15, 2025
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.R.2811 - Limit, Save, Grow Act of 2023," accessed February 23, 2024
- ↑ Clerk of the United States House of Representatives, "Roll Call 199," accessed May 15, 2025
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.Con.Res.9 - Denouncing the horrors of socialism." accessed February 23, 2024
- ↑ Clerk of the United States House of Representatives, "Roll Call 106," accessed May 15, 2025
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.R.1 - Lower Energy Costs Act," accessed February 23, 2024
- ↑ Clerk of the United States House of Representatives, "Roll Call 182," accessed May 15, 2025
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.J.Res.30 - Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Labor relating to 'Prudence and Loyalty in Selecting Plan Investments and Exercising Shareholder Rights'." accessed February 23, 2024
- ↑ Clerk of the United States House of Representatives, "Roll Call 149," accessed May 15, 2025
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.J.Res.7 - Relating to a national emergency declared by the President on March 13, 2020." accessed February 23, 2024
- ↑ Clerk of the United States House of Representatives, "Roll Call 104," accessed May 15, 2025
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.R.3746 - Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023," accessed February 23, 2024
- ↑ Clerk of the United States House of Representatives, "Roll Call 243," accessed May 15, 2025
- ↑ Congress.gov, "Roll Call 20," accessed February 23, 2024
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.Res.757 - Declaring the office of Speaker of the House of Representatives to be vacant.," accessed February 23, 2024
- ↑ Clerk of the United States House of Representatives, "Roll Call 519," accessed May 15, 2025
- ↑ Congress.gov, "Roll Call 527," accessed February 23, 2024
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.Res.757 - Declaring the office of Speaker of the House of Representatives to be vacant." accessed February 23, 2024
- ↑ Clerk of the United States House of Representatives, "Roll Call 519," accessed May 15, 2025
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.Res.878 - Providing for the expulsion of Representative George Santos from the United States House of Representatives." accessed February 23, 2024
- ↑ Clerk of the United States House of Representatives, "Roll Call 691," accessed May 15, 2025
- ↑ Congress.gov, "Social Security Fairness Act of 2023." accessed February 13, 2025
- ↑ Clerk of the United States House of Representatives, "Roll Call 456," accessed May 15, 2025
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.R.2 - Secure the Border Act of 2023," accessed February 13, 2025
- ↑ Clerk of the United States House of Representatives, "Roll Call 209," accessed May 15, 2025
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.R.4366 - Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024," accessed February 13, 2025
- ↑ Clerk of the United States House of Representatives, "Roll Call 380," accessed May 15, 2025
- ↑ Congress.gov, "Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act of 2024," accessed February 23, 2024
- ↑ Clerk of the United States House of Representatives, "Roll Call 30," accessed May 15, 2025
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.R.8070 - Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025," accessed February 18, 2025
- ↑ Clerk of the United States House of Representatives, "Roll Call 279," accessed May 15, 2025
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.R.6090 - Antisemitism Awareness Act of 2023," accessed February 13, 2025
- ↑ Clerk of the United States House of Representatives, "Roll Call 172," accessed May 15, 2025
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.R.3935 - FAA Reauthorization Act of 2024," accessed February 13, 2025
- ↑ Clerk of the United States House of Representatives, "Roll Call 200," accessed May 15, 2025
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.R.9495 - Stop Terror-Financing and Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act," accessed February 13, 2025
- ↑ Clerk of the United States House of Representatives, "Roll Call 477," accessed May 15, 2025
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.Res.863 - Impeaching Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security, for high crimes and misdemeanors." accessed February 13, 2025
- ↑ Clerk of the United States House of Representatives, "Roll Call 43," accessed May 15, 2025
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.R.9747 - Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025," accessed February 13, 2025
- ↑ Clerk of the United States House of Representatives, "Roll Call 450," accessed May 15, 2025
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.R.3684 - Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act," accessed April 15, 2022
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.R.1319 - American Rescue Plan Act of 2021," accessed April 15, 2022
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.R.5376 - Inflation Reduction Act of 2022," accessed January 20, 2023
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.R.3617 - Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement Act," accessed January 20, 2023
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.R.1 - For the People Act of 2021," accessed April 15, 2022
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.R.1808 - Assault Weapons Ban of 2022," accessed January 20, 2023
- ↑ Congress.gov, "S.1605 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022," accessed April 15, 2022
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.R.7776 - James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023," accessed January 20, 2023
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.R.6 - American Dream and Promise Act of 2021," accessed April 15, 2022
- ↑ Congress.gov, "S.3373 - Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring our Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics Act of 2022," accessed January 20, 2023
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.R.4346 - Chips and Science Act," accessed January 20, 2023
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.R.3755 - Women's Health Protection Act of 2021," accessed April 15, 2022
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.R.1996 - SAFE Banking Act of 2021," accessed April 15, 2022
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.R.2471 - Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022," accessed January 20, 2023
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.R.5 - Equality Act," accessed April 15, 2022
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.R.8404 - Respect for Marriage Act," accessed January 20, 2023
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.R.6833 - Continuing Appropriations and Ukraine Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2023," accessed January 20, 2023
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.R.7688 - Consumer Fuel Price Gouging Prevention Act," accessed January 20, 2023
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.R.8 - Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2021," accessed January 20, 2023
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.R.5746 - Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act," accessed January 20, 2023
- ↑ Congress.gov, "S.2938 - Bipartisan Safer Communities Act," accessed January 20, 2023
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.Res.24 - Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors.," accessed April 15, 2022
- ↑ Congress.gov, "H.R.2617 - Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023," accessed January 20, 2023
| Political offices | ||
|---|---|---|
| Preceded by Lucille Roybal-Allard (D) |
U.S. House California District 40 2023-Present |
Succeeded by - |
| Preceded by Gil Cisneros (D) |
U.S. House California District 39 2021-2023 |
Succeeded by Mark Takano (D) |
| Preceded by Sharon Quirk-Silva (D) |
California State Assembly District 65 2014-2016 |
Succeeded by Sharon Quirk-Silva (D) |
= candidate completed the 

